New States in India
Various Statehood Demands in India
- Vidarbha: It comprises the Amravati and Nagpur divisions of eastern Maharashtra.
- UP into four smaller states: In 2011, then UP CM and BSP chief, Mayawati, passed a resolution in the Assembly to split– Purvanchal, Bundelkhand, Awadh Pradesh and Paschim Pradesh.
- Harit Pradesh: It consists of agriculturally dominated districts of Western Uttar Pradesh.
- Purvanchal: It is region of north-central India, comprising the eastern Uttar Pradesh.
- Bodoland: The Bodos are the largest ethnic and linguistic community in northern Assam.
- Saurashtra: The movement for a separate Saurashtra state from Gujarat.
- Gorkhaland: It is a proposed state covering areas inhabited by the ethnic Gorkha (Nepali) people, namely Darjeeling hills and Dooars in the northern part of West Bengal.
Constitutional Provisions
- Article 3 of the IC: It Grants Parliament the authority to undertake various actions regarding the formation, alteration, or dissolution of states.
- Actions include the formation of new states, increase or decrease in state area, alteration of state boundaries, and change of state name.
Conditions under Article 3
- A bill must be introduced in either house of Parliament only with the prior recommendation of the President.
- Before recommending the bill, the President must refer it to the concerned state legislature to express its views within a specified period.
Reasons for Demand
- All these demands are from regions that are poor in spite of being rich in natural resources.
- Disputes exist regarding the over-sharing and utilisation of natural resources with the mother state.
- Linguistic and cultural reasons, which were the primary basis for creating new states in the country, have now become secondary in most of these cases.
- Other factors are:
- Competition for local resources.
- Government negligence towards certain regions
- Improper allocation of the resources,
- The economy’s failure to create enough employment opportunities,
- Popular mobilisation and the democratic political process,
- ‘The sons of the soil‘ sentiments.
Issues Arising due to the creation of New States
- Different statehoods may lead to the hegemony of the dominant community/ caste over their power structures, leading to the emergence of intra-regional rivalries among the sub-regions.
- Aggressive regionalism could also develop in such states, leading to the growth of the sons-of-the-soil phenomenon and the consequent intimidation of the migrants.
- Statehood cannot guarantee rapid economic development of those backward regions that do not have the required material and human resources.
- Besides, some of the small states may not have the potential for economic viability.
- There is also the possibility of an increase in interstate water, power and boundary disputes.
- The division of states would require enormous funds for building new capital and maintaining a large number of governors, chief ministers, ministers, and administrators.
- The creation of smaller states doesn’t empower already existing institutions like Gram Panchayat, District Collector, etc.
- Experiments of smaller states show that the mere formation of a smaller state is no guarantee for better development. E.g.
- Uttarakhand continues to be at the lower end of the Human Development Index,
- Chhattisgarh has witnessed the most significant displacement of tribals and
- Jharkhand was mired in corruption and maladministration.
- The risk of centralisation of powers in the hands of the CM and the CM’s Secretariat would be more significant.
|