{GS2 – MoSPI – Initiatives} National Industrial Classification (NIC) 2025
- Context (PIB | ET): The Ministry of Statistics & Programme Implementation (MoSPI) has released the draft National Industrial Classification (NIC) 2025 for feedback, updating NIC-2008.
Background
- India’s first Standard Industrial Classification was introduced in 1962, and has since been updated regularly in line with the UN’s International Standard Industrial Classification (ISIC).
- The last revision, NIC-2008, became outdated due to technological & structural changes in economy.
- The update was necessitated after the UN Statistical Commission adopted ISIC Revision 5 in 2024.
Key Features of NIC-2025
- It is aligned with ISIC 5 up to the 4-digit level for better international comparability.
- The number of Sub-Classes has increased to about 1900 (from 1304 in NIC-2008).
- Provides greater detail in Finance, Agriculture, IT, & Telecommunication for more accurate data tracking.
- It includes new sectors such as Renewable Energy, Fintech, Intermediation services, AYUSH, E-commerce, and the Digital Economy.
Read More > Uneven Industrial Distribution in India
{GS2 – Governance – Issues} GST on Delivery Services Through E-Commerce
- Context (IE): The GST Council’s 56th meeting brought delivery services via e-commerce operators under Section 9(5) of the CGST Act, 2017, levying 18% GST.
- The decision followed disputes where platforms claimed delivery partners acted as independent vendors and should bear the service tax liability.
GST Framework on Delivery Services
- Delivery Services: Delivery charges via e-commerce & quick-commerce operators are now taxed at 18%.
- Restaurant Services: Food supplied through e-commerce operators continues to attract 5% GST only.
- Own Deliveries: Food plus delivery supplied directly by restaurants taxed 5% as composite service.
- If one orders food worth ₹100 via Swiggy with a ₹10 delivery charge, the food attracts 5% GST (₹5) and delivery attracts 18% GST (₹1.8), making the total ₹116.8.
- Similarly, if one orders the same directly from the restaurant with ₹10 delivery, the entire ₹110 is taxed at 5% GST (₹ 5.50), making the total ₹ 115.50.
|
Objectives of the Decision
- Tax Clarity: Reduces litigation burdens by uniformly taxing all platform-based delivery services.
- Revenue Expansion: Broadens overall GST base by covering high-frequency urban delivery services.
- Compliance Shift: Transfers GST liability from delivery partners directly to e-commerce operators.
Associated Challenges
- Consumer Burden: Higher GST on delivery charges will increase overall customer bills.
- Worker Impact: Platforms may reduce delivery partner earnings to absorb added GST.
- Competitive Distortion: Restaurant self-deliveries are taxed 5%, creating unequal treatment.
Way Forward
- Billing Controls: Require itemised invoices showing base food, delivery, and GST components.
- Shared Burden: Distribute GST impact fairly between platforms, restaurants, and end customers.
- Impact Monitoring: Track customer demand changes & gig-worker income effects for policy evaluation.
Read More > E-commerce Policy
{GS2 – Governance – Issues} Recognising India’s Waste Workers
- Context (IE | DTE): Informal waste workers recycle up to 20% of urban waste, driving a circular economy, yet remain excluded from rights, social security, and formal systems.
- The circular economy is an economic model that reduces waste by reusing and recycling resources in a closed-loop system, unlike the traditional linear take-make-dispose approach.
|
Environmental and Economic Contribution
- Savings: Divert 400,000 tonnes annually from Delhi’s landfills, saving ₹54.75 crore in disposal costs.
- Plastic Recycling: India’s 60% recycling rate, four times the global average, is largely due to waste pickers and kabadiwalas.
- Emission Reduction: In Delhi, their work prevents 960,000 tonnes of CO₂ annually, three times more than waste-to-energy plants.
- Urban Resilience: By preventing clogging and flooding, they maintain civic infrastructure at minimal municipal cost.
- India generates 62 million tonnes of municipal solid waste annually and only 22-28% of this waste is formally processed.
|
Socio-Economic Vulnerabilities
- Low Earnings: Around 70% of waste workers earn less than ₹10,000 per month (UNDP, 2022), with women typically earning even less.
- Vulnerable Demographics: Workforce largely composed of marginalised castes, migrants, and women, with children often forced into work.
- Occupational Hazards: Unsafe conditions with minimal protective gear, constant exposure to medical waste and toxins, lead to chronic illnesses.
- Social Stigma: Workers are perceived as “polluting,” facing exclusion from labour statistics and welfare schemes.
- In 2008, the First World Conference of Waste Pickers in Colombia adopted the term “waste picker” to replace the derogatory term “scavenger.”
|
Structural and Policy Challenges
- Displacement: Privatisation and mechanisation in cities like Delhi displaced 50% of waste pickers, cutting down income opportunities.
- Policy Neglect: Lack of a uniform national policy to ensure inclusion in Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) frameworks.
- Poor Implementation: Solid Waste Management Rules (2016) mandate inclusion of waste pickers, but enforcement is weak, and many remain unregistered and outside welfare access.
Successful Models in India
- SWaCH Cooperative: A cooperative of 3,000+ women waste pickers in Pune, engaged in door-to-door collection, ensuring fair wages and access to social security.
- Dry Waste Centres: These collection centres in Bengaluru diverted over 2000 tonnes of plastic in 2018, showcasing decentralised recycling efficiency.
- NAMASTE Scheme: The National Action for Mechanised Sanitation Ecosystem (GOI+ UNDP) provides waste workers with training, health insurance, and subsidies.
- CSR Models: Corporate Social Responsibility initiatives like the Tetra Pak–Bal Vikas Dhara project in Delhi-NCR formalised waste pickers, improving income and welfare for 3,000+ workers.
Read More > Waste Management in India
{GS2 – Governance – Initiatives} Household Finance & Farm Assessment Surveys
- Context (PIB | TH): The NSO, under MoSPI, will conduct the All-India Debt and Investment Survey (AIDIS) and the Situation Assessment Survey (SAS) between July 2026 and June 2027.
- National Statistics Office (NSO), founded in 2019 by merging the CSO and NSSO, serves as the apex body for large-scale household surveys and official socio-economic data.
|
All-India Debt and Investment Survey
- AIDIS is India’s flagship household finance survey, initiated in 1951–52, conducted decennially by NSO.
- Objective: It measures household debt, savings, and asset distribution across both rural and urban areas.
- Significance: It includes institutional and non-institutional credit, widely used by RBI, MoSPI, and NITI Aayog for credit policies and asset-creation schemes.
About Situation Assessment Survey
- The SAS, launched in 2003, evaluates farm household well-being by tracking income, expenditure, indebtedness, production, technology adoption, and access to schemes and insurance.
- Significance: It covers all agricultural households, including landless cultivators, and is used for rural development, credit reforms, and insurance policy design.
{GS3 – IE – Banking} India’s e-Rupee Expansion *
- Context (LM): The RBI’s e-rupee, India’s CBDC, alongside UPI growth (700+ million daily transactions) and Next-Gen GST reforms, offers a chance to boost security, transparency, and efficiency.
- CBDC: The Central Bank Digital Currency is a sovereign digital money issued by the central bank, equivalent to paper currency.
|
Rationale for Expansion
- Financial Inclusion: e-rupee wallets enable direct transfers without bank accounts, supporting migrants’ families in underbanked areas, improving financial inclusion.
- Tax Compliance: e-rupee blockchain transactions enhance traceability and compliance, lowering fraud.
- Blockchain is a decentralised digital ledger storing transactions permanently, securely, and transparently across a shared network.
|
- Remittance Advantage: e-rupee allows faster, cheaper wallet transfers, cutting costs and dollar reliance.
- Targeted Delivery: e-rupee enables preset fund use, ensuring subsidies reach intended beneficiaries.
Read More > Cryptocurrency vs. CBDC
{GS3 – IE – Urbanization} Kerala’s Urbanisation Model
- Context (TH): The Kerala Urban Policy Commission (KUPC) report offers a model to tackle India’s rapid urbanisation, with urban population expected to exceed 50% by 2050.
About the KUPC
- The KUPC, formed in December 2023, is India’s first State-level urban commission, tasked with a 25-year roadmap to shift urban planning from reactive projects to systemic approaches.
- Rationale: Kerala’s urbanisation exceeds the national average, expected to reach 80% by 2050, amid rising flood, landslide, and sea-level pressures.
Key Recommendations of KUPC Report
- Zoning: Risk-sensitive planning requires hazard mapping for floods, landslides, and coastal inundation.
- Data Observatory: Establish a real-time observatory integrating Light Detection and Ranging (LIDAR), tide gauges, and satellite imagery datasets.
- Green Fees: Apply green fees in eco-sensitive zones and parametric insurance for disaster-prone areas.
- Fiscal Tools: Large cities should issue municipal bonds; smaller towns should adopt pooled instruments.
- Governance Overhaul: Elected city cabinets, specialist municipal cadres, and a “Jnanashree” program deploying youth technocrats to overcome bureaucratic inertia.
- Economic Revival: Promote Thrissur-Kochi as FinTech, Thiruvananthapuram-Kollam as knowledge, and Palakkad-Kasaragod as industrial corridors.
- Urban Renewal: Revive wetlands, conserve heritage, and establish city health councils.
Uniqueness of the KUPC Report
- Systemic Integration: KUPC linked community narratives with data, fostering participatory governance.
- Co-Produced Policy: It replaced top-down approaches, demonstrating inclusive policymaking methods.
- Climate Embedding: It integrated hazard awareness with disaster-ready frameworks.
- Sub-National Innovation: KUPC showed the value of State-level commissions tailored to realities.
Read More > India’s Urban Transition | National Plan to Build New Cities
{GS3 – Infra – Initiatives} New Highway Concession Pact *
- Context (LM): The Government of India is set to roll out a revised Model Concession Agreement (MCA) for highway projects under the Build-Operate-Transfer (BoT) mode by September 2025.
- Model Concession Agreement: A standard contract between govt. and private developer that sets rules for building, operating, and transferring a project.
- Build-Operate-Transfer: A PPP model where a private player builds a highway, operates it by collecting tolls for a fixed time, before transferring it back to the government.
|
Key Provisions in Draft MCA
- Risk Sharing: Clearer rules on traffic variation, with compensation or extension of concession period.
- Exit & Substitution: Developers can exit midway by selling stakes; the government is empowered (alongside banks) to replace delayed or stressed concessionaires.
- Lender Protection: Full settlement of non-recourse funding ensured in termination cases.
- Flexibility: Agencies can buy back projects before concession expiry, releasing capital for reinvestment.
Significance of the New BoT Push
- Once dominant, BoT projects lost appeal due to traffic risks and liquidity crunch, falling to almost nil after 2014.
- From 2018-2020, no projects were awarded under BoT, while EPC (Engineering, Procurement, Construction) dominated (~81% of awards between 2016-25).
- Government now seeks to revive the model to reduce fiscal burden and bring long-term private participation.
{GS3 – S&T – Tech} India’s Path Towards Technological Independence **
- Context (TH): India faces the challenge of dependence on foreign technologies, making technological independence essential to ensure true sovereignty and reduce strategic vulnerabilities.
Why Technological Sovereignty Matters?
- Cyber Threats: Modern wars are fought with software, drones, and cyberattacks, making reliance on external technology a national risk.
- Dependence Risks: India lacks homegrown operating systems, databases, and foundational software, leaving the nation exposed if foreign companies cut access to cloud or AI services.
- Infrastructure at Risk: Banks, trains, power grids, & governance systems rely on imported technologies.
Software Sovereignty
- Open-Source: India can build secure versions of Linux and Android, free from hidden vulnerabilities.
- Collective Effort: Requires a large user base, continuous support, and contributions from India’s vast IT workforce.
- Holistic Development: Beyond OS, India must develop and maintain databases, email clients/servers, cloud servers, and web servers, all available as open-source, but requiring long-term management.
Hardware Sovereignty
- Greater Challenge: Requires semiconductor fabs, which demand huge investments, patience, and expertise.
- Pragmatic Approach: Start with chip design, assembly, and partnerships, even if fabrication is outsourced.
- Strategic Vision: Focus on critical hardware components before aiming for complete self-reliance.
Way Forward
- National Mission: Create a dedicated mission focused on development and implementation.
- Business Model: Ensure a self-sustaining framework beyond government funding to maintain long-term viability.
- Ecosystem Approach: Encourage industry, academia, startups, and the open-source community to collaborate.
- Government Role: Enable policy support, incentives, and infrastructure, while letting the mission grow independently.