FRP vs MSP
Subscribers of "Current Affairs" course can Download Daily Current Affairs in PDF/DOC
Subscribe to Never Miss an Important Update! Assured Discounts on New Products!
Must Join PMF IAS Telegram Channel & PMF IAS History Telegram Channel
- Context (IE): Protesting farmers have repeatedly called for an increase in the Minimum Support Price (MSP). Let us understand the differences between the two price support mechanisms (MSP vs Fair and Remunerative Price (FRP)).
MSP vs FRP
Features | MSP (Minimum Support Price) | FRP (Fair and Remunerative Price) |
Who determines it? |
|
|
Purchased by? | Government |
Sugar Mills |
Crops Covered | 22 crops + Sugarcane. | Specifically for sugarcane. Sugarcane has both FRP and Minimum Selling Price. |
Payment Guarantee | The government commits to buying the crop at MSP if market prices fall below it. No Legal guarantee. | Legal obligation for sugar mills to pay FRP to sugarcane farmers.
Backed by: Sugarcane Control Order (1966). |
Basis of calculation? |
|
|
Penalties for Non-Payment | No specific penalties were mentioned. | Cane commissioners can take action, including attachment of mill properties as arrears of land revenue if FRP dues are not cleared within 14 days of the sale. |
|
Why does sugarcane have both the FRP and Minimum Selling Price?
- FRP is to support Farmers: Since sugarcane has a very short shelf life, the responsibility of procurement of cane is on the sugar mills that are mandatorily expected to pay the FRP on purchase upfront.
- Minimum selling price is to support sugar mills: The absence of shelf life prompts them to sell their produce at any price prevailing in the cane-crushing season, irrespective of demand and supply forces.
Persisting Issue
|