
30 Year’s of PESA Act
- The Ministry of Panchayati Raj recently organised PESA Mahotsav: Utsav Lok Sanskriti Ka in Visakhapatnam. The event marked the 30th anniversary of the Panchayats (Extension to Scheduled Areas) Act, 1996 (PESA).
About the PESA Act
- Origin: Enacted in 1996 following the Bhuria Committee (1995), which recommended tribal self-rule to correct the historical exclusion of Scheduled Areas from mainstream decentralisation.
- Constitutional Gap: PESA was designed to cover Fifth Schedule Areas left outside the 73rd Constitutional Amendment (Part IX of the Constitution), ensuring self-governance.
- Tribal Governance: The Act empowers Gram Sabhas and Panchayats in Fifth Schedule Areas to uphold traditional governance systems and exercise enhanced local authority.
- State Legislature Role: State legislatures are expected to play a facilitative and advisory role.
- Institutional Responsibility: The Ministry of Panchayati Raj (MoPR) acts as the nodal ministry.
- Spatial Reach: Operates across 10 Fifth Schedule states, spanning ~77,500 villages and ~22,000 Panchayats, giving PESA national-scale relevance.
Significance of the PESA Act
- Demographic Empowerment: Covers 8.6% of India’s population belonging to Scheduled Tribes, addressing governance in some of the most marginalised regions.
- Gram Sabha Supremacy: Gram Sabha is the core institution of self-governance in Scheduled Areas, with authority over social, economic and cultural matters affecting the community.
- Land Protection: Mandatory consultation and consent of Gram Sabha before land acquisition, resettlement or rehabilitation in Scheduled Areas, preventing arbitrary land alienation.
- Forest Rights Control: Gram Sabhas have ownership and management rights over minor forest produce, strengthening livelihood security for tribal households.
- Mining Regulation: Recommendation of Gram Sabha is required for granting leases for minor minerals.
- Customary Law Recognition: Traditional customs, dispute resolution mechanisms and cultural practices of tribal communities are legally recognised and protected.
- Social Regulation: Gram Sabhas are empowered to prevent intoxicant abuse and regulate money-lending practices to protect vulnerable households.
Salient Features of the PESA Act
- Gram Sabha: Every village must have a Gram Sabha or village assembly composed of adults registered to vote in that village’s Panchayat.
- Composition: Reserved seats for STs, SCs, and others must reflect actual population percentages in the Panchayat area; STs receive at least 50% of seats if their population is below 50%. Every Chairperson at all levels must be an ST.
- Consonance with Customary Law: State laws must adhere to tribal laws, customs, and practices to protect traditional governance and cultural identity.
- Mandatory Approval: Gram Sabha approval is mandatory before village Panchayats implement any development plans; it also decides who benefits from welfare programmes.
- Village Defined: A village is defined as a habitation or group of habitations/hamlets that forms a community and shares traditions and customs, not by administrative boundaries.
- Financial Certification Requirement: Village Panchayats must obtain a certificate from the Gram Sabha confirming that funds for plans or programmes were correctly used.
- Gram Sabha’s Competence: Every Gram Sabha has the authority to protect its way of life, traditions, resources, and modes of dispute resolution.
- Nomination of Unrepresented Tribes: If some ST groups do not have elected members, the state government can nominate them at the block or district levels to ensure representation.
Key Issues in PESA Implementation
- Uneven Rule Adoption: Only 8 out of 10 Fifth Schedule states have notified PESA Rules, creating legal uncertainty in Odisha and Jharkhand.
- Diluted Authority: In the Hasdeo Arand coal blocks (Chhattisgarh), forest and mining clearances proceeded despite multiple Gram Sabha resolutions opposing mining.
- Capacity Constraints: During MoPR-led assessments, more than 40% of elected representatives in PESA Panchayats were unable to explain the concept of Gram Sabha clearly.
- Monitoring Gaps: Absence of a unified monitoring framework across ~63 Fifth Schedule districts weakens accountability and enforcement.
- Administrative Resistance: In the Polavaram irrigation project (Andhra Pradesh), displacement continued under sectoral project laws even as PESA-mandated Gram Sabha consent was contested.
Way Forward
- Law Convergence: Integrate PESA with the Forest Rights Act (2006) and Land Acquisition Act (2013) so Gram Sabha consent becomes a single, binding clearance.
- Clear Role Allocation: Clearly demarcate responsibilities between MoPR and Ministry of Tribal Affairs; E.g., MoPR to handle governance processes, MoTA to safeguard land, forest and livelihood rights.
- Uniform Rule Design: Develop model PESA Rules for adoption by all states; E.g., central templates with limited state flexibility to prevent dilution.
- Continuous Capacity Support: Shift from one-time training to ongoing handholding; E.g., community paralegal and barefoot governance facilitator pilots.
- Incentive Alignment: Link effective PESA compliance to funding incentives; E.g., higher untied grants for Panchayats demonstrating strong Gram Sabha-led governance.
Tribal self-governance under PESA requires empowered Gram Sabhas, clear laws, and sustained capacity-building; without these, development remains procedural. As PM Modi said, “Opportunities must reach tribal youth.”
Reference: PIB
PMF IAS Pathfinder for Mains – Question 475
Q. Examine the extent to which the Panchayats (Extension to Scheduled Areas) Act, 1996, has enabled genuine tribal self-governance, with reference to the role of Gram Sabhas in land and resource-related development decisions. (250 Words) (15 Marks)
Approach
- Introduction: Write a concise introduction about the Panchayats (Extension to Scheduled Areas) Act, 1996.
- Body: Examine the extent to which the PESA Act, 1996, has enabled genuine tribal self-governance, mention implementation gaps and way forward.
- Conclusion: Focus on an empowered and accountable gram sabha for pro-tribal development.















