Whip System in India: Origin, Importance & Its Criticism

Whip System in India: Origin, Importance & Criticism

Never Miss an Important Update! Assured Discounts on New Products!

Table of contents

Context (IE): The Vice President recently sparked a debate by criticizing the party whip system, stating it curtails MPs’ freedom of expression and independence.

Origin of the Whip System

The term “whip” comes from the hunting field, where a “whipper-in” kept stray hounds together.
In politics, first used by Edmund Burke to describe rallying party followers during parliamentary matters.

The concept of the whip was inherited from colonial British rule.
It is often used in parliamentary parlance for floor management by political parties.
A whip is a written order that a political party issues to its members for being present for a crucial vote or that they vote only in a particular way.
A whip is also an essential office-bearer of the party in the Parliament.
In India, all parties can issue a whip to their members.
The office of ‘whip’ is mentioned neither in the IC, in the Rules of the House, nor in the Parliamentary Statute. It is based on the conventions of the parliamentary government.

In India, the system has been in place since the early days of Parliament, ensuring party unity & discipline.
The All-India Whips Conference, held annually since 1952, fosters coordination between ruling and opposition whips for efficient parliamentary functioning.

One-Line Whip: Informs members of a vote, allowing them to abstain.
Two-Line Whip: Requires MPs to be present, but does not mandate how to vote.
Three-Line Whip: The strictest, instructing members to vote in alignment with the party.

In Lok Sabha: The Minister of Parliamentary Affairs acts as the Chief Whip for the ruling party.
In Rajya Sabha: Minister of State for Parliamentary Affairs handles this responsibility.

Issuance of Directive: The party issues a whip, specifying attendance and voting directions.
Mandatory Compliance: Members must adhere to the whip to maintain party unity.
Expulsion: Severe breaches may lead to expulsion from the party.
Action Against Defiance: Party leaders may recommend disqualification under the Anti-Defection Law (1985) for violations.

Conscience Votes: MPs can vote freely on moral or ethical issues, with party permission.
Prior Approval: Members may defy the whip if explicitly allowed by party leadership.

United Kingdom: Whips exist but MPs occasionally defy them without severe repercussions.
Australia: Whip system operates similarly, with room for conscience votes in critical matters.
Canada: Greater flexibility exists, especially in non-confidence or private member bills.

Responsibility: Issues directives to MPs to ensure participation & adherence during parliamentary proceedings.
Maintains Party Discipline: Ensures coherence and unity within the party during crucial votes in Parliament.
Stabilizes Parliamentary Democracy: Prevents disruptions during critical legislative processes.
Guides MPs’ Actions: Aligns MPs with party ideologies and decisions.
Facilitates Governance: Enhances efficiency in the legislative process through coordinated efforts.
Demonstrates Party’s Strength and Unity, especially during division voting on key issues.
Non-Compliance Can Lead To Embarrassment and even affect the outcome of votes, potentially triggering a no-confidence motion.

Curtails Autonomy: Limits MPs’ freedom of expression and independent decision-making.
Suppresses Dissent: Forces MPs to align with the party, discouraging diverse opinions.
Concentrates Power: Strengthens party leadership’s control, sidelining individual voices.