| Feature | First Past the Post (FPTP) | Proportional Representation (PR) |
| Winner Selection | The candidate with the most votes in a constituency wins. | Seats are allocated based on the party’s overall vote share (Party List PR). |
| Representation of Parties | Can lead to over/under-representation of parties. | Seats closely reflect parties’ vote shares. |
| Voter Choice | Vote for individual candidates. | Often, vote for party lists, not individuals. |
| Governing Majorities | Provides stability by allowing the ruling party/coalition to govern with a majority. | May lead to coalition governments and diverse representation. |
| Political Diversity | Tends to favour two-party systems. | Encourages multi-party systems. |
| Geographical Representation | The strong link between MPs and local constituencies. | Weaker local ties, especially in list-based PR. |
| Simplicity | Simple to understand and count. | It can be more complex (depending on the specific PR system) |
| Wasted Votes | High (votes for non-winning candidates don’t count). | Low (most votes contribute to seat allocation). |
| Examples | UK, US, India, Canada. | Brazil, Argentina, South Africa. |
| Thresholds | No minimum vote threshold. | Often has a minimum vote % for representation (e.g., 3-5% vote share). |
| Minority Representation | Can underrepresent minorities | Better represents minority views |
| Extremist Parties | Tends to marginalise | May give a platform to extreme views |
| By-elections | Required if MP resigns/dies | Often filled from party lists |
|
