
Forest Governance in India: Challenges & Way Ahead
- Recent tiger deaths at Malai Mahadeshwara Hills Wildlife Sanctuary in Karnataka highlight the risks of prioritizing infrastructure expansion over ecological preservation. This incident underscores the urgent need to balance development with wildlife conservation.
Infrastructure Impact on Indian Forests
- Extent of Diversion: Between 2014 and 2024, more than 1.73 lakh hectares of forest land were diverted for non-forestry purposes.
- Primary Drivers: Hydropower and irrigation, mining and quarrying, and road construction were the top three reasons for forest land diversion.
- Linear Infrastructures: Roads and transmission lines caused a 71.5% reduction in large forest patches (i.e., larger than 10,000 sq. km).
- Afforestation Gap: From 2019-2024, 1.78 lakh hectares of compensatory afforestation were completed against a 2.09 lakh hectare target, achieving 85% success.
- Wildfire Exposure: During the 2024-25 forest fire season (November-June), India had the highest infrastructure exposure to wildfires, with $44 billion worth of assets at risk.
Legal and Constitutional Safeguards for Indian ForestsConstitutional Provisions
Legal and Judicial Safeguards
|
Key Challenges in Forest Governance
- FCA Amendment 2023: Excluded unrecorded forest lands from protection, exempted specific projects from clearances, and removed Gram Sabha consent in some instances.
- Compensatory Afforestation: Replacement plantations often do not replicate natural forests, resulting in low biodiversity and a poor sapling survival rate.
- FRA Implementation: Weak enforcement, bureaucratic delays, and political interference have limited community participation in forest governance.
- Weak FRA Implementation: Bureaucratic delays, poor enforcement, and political resistance hinder forest community participation and forest governance.
- Policy Conflict: Economic growth often overrides environmental safeguards; protection laws are viewed as obstacles to ‘ease of doing business.’
- Cumulative Impact: Environmental clearances are often issued on a case-by-case basis, ignoring cumulative ecological impacts and landscape-level degradation.
Recent Government Initiatives
|
Way Forward
- Landscape Planning: Integrate biodiversity corridors like the 32 tiger corridors identified by the Wildlife Institute of India to maintain ecological connectivity.
- Robust EIA: Include cumulative impact studies. E.g., 68% of linear projects (2015–22) lacked proper ecological assessment.
- Community Stewardship: Empower Gram Sabhas under the FRA. E.g., Gadchiroli villages earned ₹100+ crore via sustainable bamboo use.
- Eco-Infrastructure: Mandate wildlife crossings. E.g., NH-44’s underpasses in Pench cut wildlife collisions by over 80%.
- Green Governance: Align projects with Articles 48A & 51A(g). E.g., Ken–Betwa link shows the need to balance irrigation gains with tiger habitat protection.
Sustainable development must harmonize economic progress with ecological preservation through inclusive and nature-positive governance. As aptly stated, “Environmental protection is not a luxury, but a necessity for survival and sustainable development.
Reference: The Hindu
PMF IAS Pathfinder for Mains – Question 389
Q. Incidents of wildlife mortality across India underscore the tension between infrastructure expansion and ecological sustainability. Analyse the challenges in balancing developmental priorities with biodiversity conservation and propose measures to reinforce environmental governance. (250 Words) (15 Marks)
Approach
- Introduction: Write a contextual introduction by mentioning the Tiger deaths at Malai Mahadeshwara Hills.
- Body: Analyse tension between infrastructure expansion and ecological sustainability, challenges in balancing developmental priorities with biodiversity conservation, and suggest measures to reinforce environmental governance.
- Conclusion: Emphasis on a balanced and sustainable approach and mention future course of action.




















