Context (IE): The recent arrest of a serving Chief Minister has brought the question of constitutional morality, highlighting the importance of moral behaviour that political institutions should uphold.
What is Constitutional Morality?
Constitutional morality is a concept that emphasises adherence to the principles and values enshrined in a constitution within a democratic system.
It goes beyond strict legal interpretation, encompassing values like social justice and equality.
It balances freedom and restraint, requiring citizens to submit to constitutional authorities while retaining the freedom to criticise those in power.
It encourages the evolution of law in response to changing societal norms and values.
Courts use it to adapt legal principles to reflect contemporary understandings of justice, equality, etc.
Evolution
The term ‘Constitutional Morality’ was first used by the English Historian George Grote.
He described it as popular sovereignty based on freedom and self-restraint. It also meant that citizens had the right to criticize public officials. This highlighted the limited power of the public officials and their duty to abide and respect the Constitution.
According to him, Constitutional Morality is the “paramount reverence for the forms of the Constitution” of the land.
Constitutional Morality in the Indian Context
Indian Constitution on Constitutional Morality
The term “constitutional morality” is not explicitly mentioned in the Indian Constitution.
It can be found in:
Preamble: It outlines democratic principles like justice, liberty, and equality.
Fundamental Rights: It safeguards individual rights against arbitrary state power (Article 32).
Directive Principles: Provides guidelines for the state to pursue social and economic goals.
Fundamental Duties: These are the responsibilities of citizens towards the nation.
Checks and Balances: To prevent concentration of power.
Concepts of Discretionary Power and Non-discrimination are closely linked to constitutional morality.
The term Morality is mentioned in IC in four Articles:
Article 19 (2) (Reasonable restrictions on freedom of speech)
Article 19 (4) (Reasonable restrictions on freedom to form associations or unions)
Article 25 (1) (Freedom of conscience and right to profess, practice and propagate religion)
Article 26 (Right to freedom of religion).
Dr Ambedkar on Constitutional Morality
DrAmbedkar explained constitutional morality in one of the constituent assembly debates.
According to Dr Ambedkar, constitutional morality involves:
A deep respect for the structure of the Constitution
Adherence to authority
The practice of free speech within legal boundaries.
The confidence that the Constitution is upheld by all, irrespective of political differences.
Justice Joseph, former judge of SC, while speaking on constitutional morality, said that:
Judges are appointed to uphold the Constitution.
Constitutional Values are not the same as majoritarian views.
Supreme Court’s Interpretation
The SC used the concept of constitutional morality as an aid in the interpretation of the:
FRs provided under the IC.
Constitutional validity of the laws.
Various SC Judgements
Naz Foundation v Government of NCT, 2009: This case distinguished public morality from constitutional morality, asserting that constitutional values should take precedence over popular morality.
Krishnamoorthy case, 2015: It is essential for Good Governance
Union of India vs. Government of NCT of Delhi:High-ranking officials must adhere to constitutional values to prevent misuse of authority.
Government of NCT of Delhi case, 2018: The Court likened constitutional morality to a “second basic structure doctrine,” emphasising its role in curbing arbitrary authority.
Navtej Singh Johar case (2018):Right to privacy and dignity for LGBTQI+ community. Highlighted its role in fostering a pluralistic and inclusive society while upholding constitutional values.
Justice K S Puttaswamy case (2018):Aadhaar’s validity was upheld with restrictions, highlighting the court’s role in checking executive overreach.
Joseph Shine v. Union of India, 2018: The judgment emphasised that constitutional morality should guide the law, prioritising equality, non-discrimination, and dignity.
Significance of Constitutional Morality
It strives to keep up with society’s changing times, ideals, and objectives. E.g. abolition of sati.
It protects and supports the country’s rule of law enforcement.
Promotes and reinforces the democratic ideals of the nation.
It instills a sense of civic responsibility among citizens and prevents the usurpation of power.
Promoting diversity, it helps make the society more inclusive.
Like the basic structure test, it ensures that government actions do not violate the spirit, soul or conscience of the Constitution.
It backs the efficacy of constitutionalism.
Criticism of Constitutional Morality
Lack of specific clarity and unanimity on the theory, leaving it to the whims and fancies of judicial minds.
Encourages judicial supremacy and activism by the courts, thus violating the concept of separation of power.
Creates distrust among public towards organs of the State:The top-down imposition of constitutional morality by the Courts may instill and encourage a general distrust among public towards the Legislature and the Executive.
Constitutional Morality vs Social Morality
In the Naz Foundation vs. Government of NCT of Delhi & Ors. and Navtej Singh Johar vs. Union of India, SC ruled that constitutional morality prevailed over social morality.
Social morality
Social Morality is a set of values and norms that exist in society. These are the rules that govern how society’s members should behave with each other for their welfare and well-being.
It varies from culture to culture depending on various beliefs, practices, traditions, or customs prevalent in society. It provides an ethical framework for evaluating people’s actions.