- Context (TH): BMI (Body Mass Index) might not be the best way to measure health risks anymore.
- Instead, the Body Roundness Index (BRI) is proving to be better at predicting health conditions. This change has led healthcare professionals to consider BRI as a possible replacement for BMI.
About BRI
- It was developed by U.S. mathematician Diana Thomas in 2013.
- It measures body roundness to assess health risks more accurately than the Body Mass Index (BMI).
- It incorporates waist circumference and height to estimate body fat percentage.
- Scores range from 1 to 15. Scores above 6.9 or below 3.41 indicate higher health risks.
- BRI provides a visual, egg-shaped outline with a green zone indicating the healthy range.
Source: WileyOnlineLibrary
Why BRI is Gaining Importance?
- Ethnic Variability: BMI was based on 19th-century European populations and is inadequate for certain ethnic groups. BRI accommodates differences in fat distribution across populations, especially Asians, who tend to accumulate more abdominal fat at lower BMIs.
- Accuracy of Fat Distribution: BRI aligns with body fat percentage and visceral fat levels, providing a more accurate picture of health risks than BMI.
- Limitations of BMI: BMI only measures weight relative to height and does not differentiate between muscle, fat, or water. It also does not show where fat is distributed in the body.
- Visceral Fat Indication: BRI includes waist circumference, offering a better indication of visceral fat (fat around internal organs) associated with cardiovascular diseases and metabolic syndromes.
Health Risks Associated with BRI Scores
- Higher BRI Scores: Elevated scores suggest higher body fat, especially visceral fat, associated with diseases like Type 2 diabetes, Cardiovascular diseases, Metabolic syndromes (MetS).
- Low BRI Scores: Extremely low scores also carry risks, including malnutrition and related health issues.
Difference Between BRI and BMI
Aspect |
Body Roundness Index (BRI) |
Body Mass Index (BMI) |
Definition |
Measures body roundness to assess health risks |
Estimates body fat based on weight and height |
Developed By |
Diana Thomas (2013) |
Adolphe Quetelet (1830s) |
Components |
Waist circumference and height |
Weight and height |
Scoring Range |
1 to 15 |
Varies (underweight, normal weight, overweight, obese) |
Health Risk Indicators |
Scores above 6.9 or below 3.41 indicate higher risks |
A higher BMI indicates higher health risks |
Visual Representation |
Egg-shaped outline with a green healthy range |
No visual representation |
Fat Distribution |
Accounts for visceral fat around internal organs |
Does not indicate fat distribution |
Accuracy |
Better indication of body fat percentage and visceral fat |
Less accurate as it does not differentiate between fat, muscle, or water |
Associated Health Risks |
Type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular diseases, metabolic syndromes |
Diabetes, cardiovascular diseases, but less specific |
Calculation |
Uses waist circumference and height |
Weight (kg) / Height (m²) |
Newsletter Updates
Subscribe to our newsletter and never miss an important update!
Assured Discounts on our New Products!