Context (TH): Lok Sabha approves extension of President’s Rule in Manipur by another 6 months.
About President’s Rule
President’s Rule, also known as State Emergency or Constitutional Emergency, is a provision under Article 356 of the Constitution.
Origin: Derived from Section 93 of theGovernment of India Act, 1935, which empowered the Governor-General and Governors to handle constitutional breakdowns.
Necessity Stressed by: B.R. Ambedkar, Alladi Krishnaswami Ayyar, K. Santhanam & Thakur Das Bhargava.
It allows the central government to take direct control of a state when the state government is unable to function according to constitutional provisions (on receipt of a report from the Governor of a state).
The President can assume all or any of the functions of the state government.
Article 365 provides additional grounds for the President to invoke Article 356.
If a state government fails to comply with or implement directions given by the central government under constitutional provisions, it can lead to the imposition of the President’s Rule.
Duration & Revocation
President’s Rule can be imposed for six months initially. It can be extended for a maximum of three years with the approval of Parliament every six months.
Both Houses of Parliament must approve the imposition of the President’s Rule within two months.
The President can revoke the proclamation at any time. If the Lok Sabha rejects the continuation of the President’s Rule, it must be revoked.
The state assembly is suspended or dissolved during the President’s Rule.
Key Objectives of President’s Rule
Protect unity and integrity of the nation in a diverse society.
Address governance breakdown and uphold law and order.
Strengthen federalism while ensuring cooperation between Centre and States.
Protect individual liberty when state machinery collapses.
Ensure constitutional compliance by state governments.
Secure states from external aggression and internal disturbances under Article 355.
Political Aspects of President’s Rule
More Common in Opposition-Ruled States: Often used when Centre & State govts are from different parties.
Same-Party Impositions: Occurred in Andhra Pradesh (1973), Assam (1981), Gujarat (1974), Karnataka (1990), and Manipur (2025).
Historical Political Use: President’s Rule was imposed by the Janata Party (1977) and Indira Gandhi (1980) to dismiss opposition-ruled state governments.
Supreme Court Refused to Interfere in these political decisions.
Impact of President’s Rule on State Governance
State Administration: Governor, acting on behalf of the President, runs the State with assistance from bureaucrats or advisors. The State Assembly remains intact but non-functional during President’s Rule.
Out of 111 cases until 2015, the Assembly was dissolved in 53 cases while the rest remained in suspended animation.
The Bommai case mandates temporary suspension, with Assembly revival upon President’s Rule revocation, and the Supreme Court warns against arbitrary dissolution.
Legislative Powers: President can delegate State legislative functions to Parliament under Article 357.
Financial Control: President can approve State expenditure from the Consolidated Fund.
Instances of President’s Rule in India
Total Occurrences: Imposed 135 times since 1950 across 35 States and Union Territories.
Most Affected States:Manipur (11 times, including 2025); Uttar Pradesh (10 times); Jammu & Kashmir (longest duration – 15 years); Punjab (over 10 years due to insurgency); Puducherry (over 7 years).
First Imposition:Punjab (1951) after CM Gopi Chand Bhargava resigned.
Longest Single Instance in Manipur:1969–1972 (2 years, 157 days).
Recommendations on President Rule
Supreme Court in S.R. Bommai Case (1994): The Supreme Court ruled that imposition is subject to judicial review and recommended a floor test for the government majority.
88th Amendment (2003): Inserted a new clause (4) in Article 361, giving immunity to the Governor for the exercise of powers under Article 356.
Sarkaria Commission (1988): Use the President’s Rule sparingly and issue a warning before imposition.
Punchhi Commission (2010): Recommended a time-bound response from the President and non-dissolution of the state assembly before parliamentary approval.