
The people of India agitated against the arrival of Simon Commission because
- Indians never wanted the review of the working of the Act of 1919
- Simon Commission recommended the abolition of Dyarchy (Diarchy) in the Provinces
- there was no Indian member in the Simon Commission
- the Simon Commission suggested the partition of the country
Explanation
Option (c) is correct
- The Simon Commission had seven members, who were representatives of the three major parties in Britain – Conservative, Liberal, and Labour. However, there was no Indian representative.
- According to the British government, Indians were excluded because:
- The committee was required to report its proceedings to the British Parliament.
- There was no unanimity of Indian opinion on the problem of constitutional development. •
- In reality, the Indians were excluded because Birkenhead was afraid that in a mixed commission, there could be an alliance between the Indian and British Labour representatives (who were sympathetic to Indians).
- It recommended:
- The abolition of Dyarchy (Diarchy) and the establishment of responsible unitary government in the provinces.
- The retention of separate electorates.
- The reservation of seats for depressed classes.
- The federal structure of the Government.
- It stated that in order to cope with the diversity of the country, the ultimate character of the Indian government had to be federal.
- Separation of Burma from India and Sindh from Bombay.
- The Report did not recommend the establishment of either a responsible government or a dyarchy at the centre.
- It declared that the responsible government at the centre would be established in future, i.e. wait indefinitely.

